How can one surrender
and stay engaged within that surrender? The book reveals how African American
women converts in LA engage in tafsir (interpretation) at the
level of the everyday Sunni Islam and as part of community activism. The respondents
utilize the Quran, the prophetic traditions (hadith), Islamic history, the
Arabic language, and "spirit of Islam" (based on their definition!)
to establish a meaningful connection between their sense of reason and their
faith. Their re-reading Islam is an attempt of decentralization; that is, divesting
it from its middle eastern cultural baggage, decenter its history, and
attribute new meanings to the texts through their own social history and life
experiences. Moxley Rouse explains that as these women challenge American
hegemonic discourses about race, gender, and class, their political
consciousness is further mobilized, and their motivation for more engagement
with Islamic documents is further enhanced. In order to re-appropriate Islam,
women inject it with a discourse of liberation and promote Islamic feminism in
the traditional discourse.
I appreciate the
presence of the author/researcher throughout the book, and her openness about her
initial prejudices: having been schooled in “the virtues of Western feminism”,
at first, Moxley Rouse views females’ conversion as irrational and a
reproduction of their oppression. Once in the community, however, things made
sense. Referring to Pierre Bourdieu, she agrees that the ethnographers must be
aware of their informants’ manipulation of cultural symbols in the interest of
acquiring power or resisting oppression. Surrender is the key component in
Islam but it “doesn’t happen in the absence of engagement with the sources of
faith, the texts, and the community” (213). Hence comes the intriguing title of
the book: Engaged Surrender, which sounds like an oxymoron, but not
in my own engagement with religions.
Like the author, I
also find it unfortunate that the modern interpretations of Islam are often
challenged as personal opinion instead of as religious truth although Moxley
Rouse claims that this doesn’t deter African American Muslim women from
creating an indigenous American version of Islam (215). The women attempt to
revolutionize from within by rereading historical documents on Islam and
challenging the authenticity of some hadith by using modern translations of the
Qur’an for their tafsir.
Although
researched and emerged in a completely context from my
own, the book is still useful for exemplifying several incidents regarding
lived religion from women’s view points in a way that can empower them within a
patriarchal system. In my next
post, I will continue to discuss the topic from a comparative view, introducing two new articles: Rania Kamlas’ “Religion-based Resistance Strategies, Politics of Authenticity and Professional Women Accountants” (2018) in Syrian context, and Taghreed Jamal
Al-deen’s “Australian
Young Muslim Women’s Construction of Pious and Liberal Subjectivities,” (2020) and look into the concepts of agency and empowerment within lived Islam.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder